Human Rights

In Wasacase v The Ranchmen’s Club, 2025 AHRC 62, an employer was not liable for discrimination involving racial comments in a private conversation.

In Complainant v 4 Seasons Transport, 2025 AHRC 63, a casual admin assistant was awarded $50,000 for serious sexual harassment.

In Complainant v Respondent, 2025 AHRC 60 the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal enforced a verbal agreement against a self-represented complainant.

In Hart v Westmount Place, 2025 AHRC 52, a condo owed a procedural and substantive duty to inquire in order to accommodate a blind owner.

In Yee v Westjet, 2025 ABCJ 87 an employer was found not to have just cause to dismiss an employee who did not comply with a mandatory vaccination policy

In yet another Elliott v Imperial Oil decision, the AHRC allowed an adjournment and awarded costs

All of Bow River Law LLP’s materials posted on Youtube are for legal information and discussion purposes only, and should…

In Prieur v AHS, 2025 AHRC 33, the Human Rights Tribunal overturned a Director’s dismissal of a gender discrimination complaint, finding it needed a hearing.

In Complainant v 4 Seasons Transport, 2025 AHRC 20, the Alberta human rights tribunal ordered a complaint to be anonymized.

In Pujji v Liquor King Spruce Grove, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal rejected a sexual harassment claim, finding the complainant was not credible.

In Goman v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2025 AHRC 14, the Tribunal allowed a claim of religious accommodation involving COVID-19 to go to hearing.

In Rodd v Autism Edmonton, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal allowed a complainant to add a second complainant years after the initial complaint was filed.